In comments somewhere Joe says, "Ignore the pundits, Don. Just try FactCheck.org." Good advice. I looked and they were critical of both campaigns. That's what I wanted to see.
Seems to me you can find criticism of one side or of the other. But when the criticism seems one-sided -- if I get a sense that the critic came to it with a set agenda -- I quickly lose interest.
I don't mean punditry needs to try and give equal time. That's nonsense. Only that they are serving truth first and not a particular party. If from their point of view that results in supporting a particular party, that's fine. I just like to get a sense that a little critical thinking is involved, and that inconvenient truths aren't being swept aside.
Part of me really wants to be won over by Obama. I keep looking for that definitive moment or reason. I refuse to care about race, this thing that every one is talking about how no one is talking about. I refuse to pretend "fresh" and "new" really apply and that I'd care if they did. I refuse in other words to be irrational, to get caught up in these messianic feelings. I want a smart and energetic person in charge who looks at problems from several angles and develops solutions that are not strongly tied to a particular party or power base. Obama has the potential for this. To a lesser extent, so does McCain, whom I decided as long ago as January was the best of a bad lot.
But this nascent desire and impulse to mistrust mere feeling leaves me sensitive somehow to Obama missteps. This morning NPR interviewed his economic advisor and the guy came off as comically partisan, placing the blame for the current turmoil on eight years, specifically, of mismanagement. Bah. The truth is far more complex and required the full collusion of both parties and not just the current Prez but that guy who was President for most of the 90s too. So I maintain my doubts.
Besides, stripping it all away, O's experience as a manager pretty much breaks down to leading a Presidential campaign. This isn't much less than W's, granted, and O is a shitload smarter. But. I dunno.
I guess all the Repub-hating and Dem-bashing has left me with the feeling that people are way too wrought up over this thing and to hell with them all. This race really is no different than the other fifty plus we've had. Events in 2009 will render any previous experience and most inherent judgment moot. So what the hell.
Random pointless note: Of the four principals, Biden has the best speaking voice and Palin the worst. I liked listening to her at first -- that no-nonsense Midwestern twang. But hers is an accent that wears thin quickly. Gah. Indeed, it is when the spousal unit is at her most annoying (as every spousal unit must get periodically) that I hear remnants of Kansas in her voice. And she never even lived there. Gah, again.
Regional snobbery at its best.
7 comments:
regional snobs unite! ;)
"This race really is no different than the other fifty plus we've had."
Indeed - once again it's your choice of the lesser of two evils.
Doncha know dere, eh?
one other thought...i refuse to see obama or anyone else as 'messianic' it's so stupid, especially if you're a non-believer.
that said, i feel a sense of sadness for my fellow americans that can't seem to pick up on what is clearly positive about this man.not perfect-but positive.
honestly, in all of my 51 years, i have never been this hopeful about any candidate's promise. my father, who was a kennedy (X 2) man through and through, tells me that was the last time he believed in any presidential candidate to this degree. and trust me, my father is no easy mark. he is a former longshoreman-turned-dean of s.f. state, and one tough nut to crack!
thanks for indulging me. :)
Hey Annie,
Looking back over the last 50 years, and reading and looking at old films, I had the saem thought about Obama. I was almost 10 when RFK was done in, but I remember my Mom being very enthusiastic, and she was a registered republican (thought never voted that way as far as I know). I've thought about how much Mondale and Dukakis utterly failed to light me up and how I acutally wrote in Raoul Duke in '84 and Hunter Thompson in '88, and kind of voted for Clinton just for the hell of it rather than out of any enthusiasm, and Kerry because I thought he hadd the brains and vision but he didn't light me up either. Maybe it's just the last eight years, but I don't think that's all. Obama strikes me as a man of energy, effort, intellect and nerve. The opposite of the hopeless little fart that now occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. I do feel like Obama can at least start the process of repairing the damage, and if he does it right and gets a second term , might achieve something great. He might foul it up too and he needs to be held accountable. NO President ever again should be assumed to be The One.
Who ever was?
On voices... I kinda like Sarah's. Obama and Biden have good ones. Hillary's was yuck, though I voted for her anyway, and McCain's is just horrible. I really can't listen to him at all.
I don't like Obama, but I have to vote against the Palin/Mac ticket. Was going to write in Hillary, but that's so useless.
on a side, almost unrelated note, Palin's accent isn't exactly Midwestern. It is, I am told, pure Alaskan, which to my ears (after living in the middle of the country since 1968) sounds like Minnesotan possibly modified by some Montanan or North Dakotan. Something. Midwestern you probably don't recognize it as any accent at all unless you say stuff like "totally tubular." :)
I like Chicago best, a la Dan Akroyd, but it would wear thin...
Post a Comment