Friday, September 26, 2008

OMG The Debate!

It’s on! The debate is on! And it’s on tonight!

Pardon my enthusiasm. We were actually planning to put the furniture back into our room after having the carpet stretched. But I just don’t know if I can split my attention like that.

What do you think? Bed in the same place, or against the opposite wall? She thought to put it at an angle with the TV in the opposite corner, and I can make a little chill-out nook by the window behind the headboard: chair, bookshelf, lamp. Not that I’ll actually use it. I’d only use it when she’s asleep, and once she’s asleep ANY NOISE AT ALL awakens her as if to a declaration of war. But still. Large room. Worth a try.

Oh yeah, and the debate could be on while we do it. Sort of like watching football. Look up when there’s cheering.

* * *

What do I think? I think Obama is a smart and thoughtful man, and McCain a man of action. There are un-Presidential risks to both, and Presidential benefits too. I also think the debates are a bad idea. You know, until 1976 there weren’t any, with the famous exception of 1960. Have any of the debates you’ve seen given you any insight into the Presidential quality of any candidate? Not me. We find out who’s glib and who isn’t, who thinks on their feet fast with respect to a domestic audience, who’s encyclopedic and who had to cram. Then a crowd of self-important pundits with crossing agendas declare who “won” according to obscure and thoroughly irrelevant style points. None of that helps me at all.

But then, Coolidge was more my style so WTF do I know.

* * *

Well, it gives me a reason to leave work “early” (sad that in my biz, before six is “early”). It’d be fun to watch it at a bar. But I don’t hang out at bars, I don’t have any barfly friends, and I’m afraid to pick the wrong bar and wind up having to endure a load of cheering when a candidate says something crowd-pleasing but stupid. So we’ll just click it on at home and reload our bedroom and prepare to cringe. I really hope the guy I can’t help leaning towards doesn’t blow it. At least the veep “debate” will be pre-loaded with low expectations. Looking forward to that.

8 comments:

Paula said...

It's on in the room next to me. Mac owns the Russian issue, even though the Dems will spin it some other way. He sounded good there; O is not sounding as good as I thought he would. But as you say, what does it really matter how they do in a debate? Real life =/= usenet.

Don said...

A good debate. Whichever one you sort of supported going in appears to have edged a win.

Roy said...

I thought both candidates revealed something positive about themselves. McCain showed that he can debate lucidly and very well after a campaign running up to this that made him look like a wooden puppet, and I thought Obama revealed what looked like a capacity to do the job despite his junior status.
I think his grasp of foreign affairs is definitely McCain's strength, but I also thought Obama "held his own." It is all homework and cramming, etc., but in a way, so is the real life of a president.

Remember the Feng Shui rules about bed placement in the bedroom--people in bed should be able to see the entrance, not see a mirror. (no no don't tell me) No pointy corners pointing at your pancreas or whatever. I forget.

Don said...

So which one's the entrance, out to the hall or out to the porch? Does it count if you can see the door while you're lying on one side? I understand the pointy corners thing -- no matter where they are I will run into them. But we don't have any round furniture, so.

Roy said...

The whole idea seems to be to never feel like someone can surprise you by entering the room without being seen. This is like the mirrors by the stove. (or by your computer monitor, if your back faces your cubicle entrance) It's all about being relaxed and in control in your own environment--I think.

Good "point" about the corners--that rule may have as its origin the same idea as don't walk under ladders. I mean, duh.

Anne said...

it was pretty much a yawn-fest. i'll bet that furniture arranging was much more interesting.

however, if ahmadinejad is bad guy number one, why on earth would you be not practice saying his name properly beforehand?? that was worth several guffaws over here on the coast.

msb said...

I thought it appeared to be a draw. Nice guys arguing the same points. nearly the same resolutions. McCain quelled his temper, mostly. Obama just so graceful.

Harry said...

Maybe I've missed something, but I have yet to see McCain's famous "grasp" of foreign affairs on display. I'm not saying he doesn't have it, just that what he's displayed so far doesn't run beyond Obama's for quality. No one seems to be able to say what it is that makes McCain so fab on foreign affairs.

I thought McCain had a lousy debate, principly because he refused to engage with his opponent. He came across as wooden, grouchy and snide. I didn't get a sense ofa whole lot of thought behind his "man of action" stance. I have been supporting Obama, but I thought he missed a few opportunites, and should've been a bit more revealing at times, but he seemed unafraid to engage in the discussion directly with McCain. He seemed level-headed and knowledgeable in a useful way. For me, McCain basically was yelling, "Give one more Cold Warrior a shot at the White House!"

No way. His whole aura is aged and past. He could be a good "Elder Statesman" in the Senate perhaps, but we need a president who is somewhat of this generation.