There’s a controversy out there that’s really been bugging me. I’ve no idea if it is well-known or obscure because I don’t watch TV news. The short version:
Some white trash couple in New Jersey named their kids Adolf Hitler Campbell, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell (presumably “Hinler” was meant to be “Himmler”). The news got out when they demanded an “Adolph Hitler” birthday cake. The state came and took the kids away. The parents turn out to be a real pair of douche bags. This part is not a surprise.
This really bugs me because from all the public evidence, there is absolutely no reason for the state to intervene. They've torn that family apart. Done untold damage to the children. Sure, the parents are dopes. But that’s hardly uncommon. Is the state now going to dictate what you can and cannot name your children? Is “Osama” still okay? Would a dictator who literally killed people with his own hands (which Hitler did not) also have a disallowed name – in other words, would it be similarly wrong to give a kid the middle name of “Hussein”?
If you still think there’s justification, my next question is: What if the kid was given the name “Swastika”? I’ve often wondered if there are people out there who would react badly to a person named Swastika. To too many people, the swastika represents fascism, racism, war, and death. It is used by ignorant people to represent some of those things frequently. Go to some eurocentric culture festival out in small towns (e.g. a Highland Games or an Oktoberfest) and you might see a few peckerheads skulking off on the sidelines showing off their swastika tattoos. I’ve been tempted to go up and take their picture (some of the artwork is quite good) and see how they react. But theirs is not the true meaning of the swastika. The true meaning needs to be encouraged so that ignorance and fear can diminish. Anyone who reacted badly to someone named Swastika would be guilty of continuing the ignorance. They’d also be very rude.
I’m drinking a mocha made by a very nice girl whose name tag says “Swastika”. I mean, that’s her name. It’s kind of cool. Her parents bestowed it upon her in India as we would name a child Hope or Faith or Grace. It’s cool because to a Westerner it’s challenging. I like to imagine she has encountered countless people who have gone away wondering about it and as a result became more enlightened. It’s one of my little wishes that the swastika be rescued from its long nightmare of being a symbol for nationalist socialism. Indeed, I’ve considered getting a tattoo of one myself – inverted, with dots, so there’s no misunderstanding. Then maybe I really can go take pictures of peckerheads, show them mine, and who knows, plant a little seed of enlightenment where the light is least.
9 comments:
I agree with and fully endorse this poast.
AOL/AOL Me too!
We took the younger guys on a trip the summer after the older younger guy graduated HS. We knew in our heart of hearts (and turned out to be true) that that would probably be the last time in a very long time that we'd all be together for a vacation. There was this total solar eclipse, you see, and ... We saw a lot of Greece, Egypt, Israel, Turkey, ports along the Black Sea, &c.
Some ignoramus adults in the group were VERY CONCERNED with the swastika tile work we came across in ancient Greek sites.
"Why were the ancient Greeks using the swastika?!?!??!" they wanted to know.
Our teenage sons explained about the wheel of life and swastikas and Hitler and co-opting and what not. (Ever looked at the spine of old Rudyard Kipling books. Yup! A swastika!)
Idiots.
Those clowns who broke this family up should have their public servant badges repossessed.
no reason at all for the state to intervene. wow, that is over the top and HI ACLU. it should be a matter of seconds before they become involved. DISGUSTING.
being named Swastika? wow. you're right; the adversity she must have endured. and i thought it was bad being "Crystal"
Agree on Swastika (that people ought to know it didn't begin with the Nazis, and not to jump to a conclusion about a foreign name); not so sure I'm on board with the defense of these wacko parents though. I thought I read there was more going on than the weird names (and it could be argued that giving such names is borderline abuse--there's an article on Fox today that teen boys with odd names are more likely to commit crimes), so I will reserve judgment. If it turns out that the names were the ONLY issue with the parenting, then okay it was wrong to take the kids. And I'm not one to give the state a pass on interfering with family matters generally--we seem to have gone from one extreme to the other, and yet a lot of terrible abuse slides by.
If it turns out that the names were the ONLY issue with the parenting, then okay it was wrong to take the kids.
This.
As for the Swastika, I don't know. Language evolves and so do symbols. I think the Swastika is gone. I don't think you can take it back.
Also I hate when people name their kids shit the kids are bound to get the crap beaten out of them for. If you have something to say, howzabout you say it your own self instead of using children?
Yes, they are certainly dopes, and having arguments with family members who threaten to firebomb the house illustrate that there is something more going on than the stupid names. But if we're going to allow intervention in this case then there are arguably about ten million more that similarly need a looking at. These folks only happened to get into the radar because the local baker balked at the name and put on her den mother hat and called the authorities. Yet there are zillions of real abuse cases that never get stopped. Naming your boy Sue or Hitler or Kanye is bound to get his butt kicked in school and that is an indirect form of abuse but would you really draw the line so high above the ground? Has this impulse to use Government to identify and then solve every problem really become second nature? Whatever happened to freedom and independence and the risks and lessons that go with it?
The swastika will come back. It's too deeply ingrained in Asian culture. They're not going to let some tin-hat kraut who offed himself sixty years ago tell them what to do. If the Austrians and Israelis etc. want to perpetuate Naziism by outlawing it that's their problem.
So now I need to Google swastika to find out what the original meaning is -- is it supposed to be common knowledge? I didn't know it was anything before the Nazis. Huh.
Certainly naming your kids stupid names is no reason to take them away. I sure hope the state intervened as they did for many other reasons beyond the horrible names. (Sarah Palin's kids ought to be taken away, methinks, if that's a fair reason.)
Naming your boy Sue or Hitler or Kanye is bound to get his butt kicked in school and that is an indirect form of abuse but would you really draw the line so high above the ground?
No no no I was not suggesting that at all. I only said I hated when people did that. I also hate the Yankees, but I don't want them arrested. Well, not all of them.
I agree the state had no business taking these poor kids.
But I do advocate eugenics for their douchebag parents.
Post a Comment