Journalist Paul Conley writes:
"I had a conversation a few weeks ago ... in which I said part of the reason I blog is that, for me, the act of blogging has become part of the act of thinking. I'm a writer. And when writers think, we think as writers. Sometimes that means we think with pen in hand. Sometimes not. But it always means we assume there is an audience for our thoughts. It is that single personality trait -- an arrogance of sorts -- that allows us to be writers."
Is this true for you? It is absolutely true for me. Writing is an important part of thinking. A thought or a concept is often much more clear to me once it is before me in print. Many times I've written a paragraph, only to read it and realize that, though the paragraph expressed my thoughts well, they were not thoughts I agreed with.
I take this further. Oftentimes, my thoughts are not clear to me until I speak them. This has not only led to a lifelong struggle to keep from talking to myself as an aid to thinking. It means that in important conversations, much is left unsaid. If I am not confident that what is ready to come out is what I am really thinking, then not much is going to come out. Because spoken words can never be retrieved, I've developed a tremendous conservatism when it comes to spending them. An email, blog entry, weekly report or technical criticism can be backspaced over and verified for truth before it is saved. Not so with anything said. And so, I am silent. Too silent, but what would you? Better to keep quiet and be thought a fool, than speak a provisional thought and ... you know the rest.
The post title (which I wish I had invented, but several thousand people surely thought of it before I did) is not entirely accurate. Blogging does not lend me existence. I lead a huge amount of life that never makes it onto this thing, just as everyone else. But blogging provides a release of sorts, a board to nail my card to, a tree to climb and shout from now and then. No idea why I need that. But I do, and that too is a personality trait that allows me to be, demands that I be, a writer.
10 comments:
Oh yes. It's all of a piece for me. The feelings inspire the words that take on a life of their own, create other feelings, etc. Mostly this is in writing, not talking. Not cuz I'm worried about the words being out there though, but because I like to see the words.
very coincidentally, david was just asking me yesterday why writers blog, after we heard a story on NPR about a writer who was blogging.
i said, well, i'm a writer, and i blog, because i blog about very different things, and write about very different things, and rarely do the two meet up...
blogging is about life, while writing is fantasy/sci-fi/fiction or whatever else i choose to write about.
i think it's an important creative expression, regardless of whether you're getting paid for it ;-)
Too silent, but what would you?
I am inclined to speak up but don't recommend it unless you already have, or are willing to have alligator skin, that is thick layers of emotional scaring epoxied together with some serious detachment (generally acquired via successive defeats and humiliations because of blurting out exactly what's on my mind).
Certainly I blog because I must but also blogging is nothing for me if not a manifestation of my OCD. Beyond that it is my Will o' the Wisp, my (as wikipedia explains) ignis fatuus, "fool's fire". To blog is to hoist my ghostly light up out of the swamp and, however flickering and unsubstantial, illuminate my small corner of the night.
But it always means we assume there is an audience for our thoughts.
That's funny - and relieving. I always thought that the assumption that there is an audience for my thoughts meant I was crazy...
Blogging does not lend me existence.
Actually, it does. At least to the people who know you no other way. If you blog, you are then larger than you were before.
But blogging provides a release of sorts, a board to nail my card to, a tree to climb and shout from now and then. No idea why I need that. But I do, and that too is a personality trait that allows me to be, demands that I be, a writer.
There are certainly millions of blogs out there.
Hanging out on the net and interacting with other people has met a social need. That's why I participated in MW, and I moved to blogging because blogging, at least among you guys, is more user friendly than MW became. And by having my own blog I get to say things that I wouldn't otherwise have mentioned in MW. Blogging is a richer experience for me.
As for thinking for an audience, that's very much me. I often imagine that what I think is being expressed for someone else to hear. I don't know if that's a writer thing or not. Maybe it's a trait of those with a desire to express themselves in some way for an audience to notice-actors, artists, writers?
That's why I participated in MW, and I moved to blogging because blogging...
That's interesting. When I participated in the by now infamous MW usenet group, I found that the most satisfying posts, to write, were more like little blog entries, so when I finally caught up with everyone and the blogging thing, I kind of liked it.
Roy
Writing is an important part of thinking.
Writing, or at least verbalizing, is the same thing as thinking for me. I've heard there are people who don't think in words, but I can't even grasp that. Every thought I have is verbalized inside my head - there is not thought until it's words. If I'm reading a book, I can't just look at the page and know what it says. In my head I need to read the words, as if I were reading them aloud. If that makes sense.
Anyway. Yes. Write to think all the time. To clarify my thoughts or even to have an argument with myself and see who wins.
If you blog, you are then larger than you were before.
The Hershey's Kiss wrappers on my desk can attest to this.
Post a Comment