Friday, August 08, 2008

Shoes and Broken Mirrors

Someone got whacked on the head with a shoe. The schoolroom full of Cub Scouts was a noisy place anyway and now someone was crying.

I was all, “What? What?” until I got my wits together enough to gather them around.

The sniffler was one of those who sniffles a lot and naturally gets picked on. The new kid, whose spirited permutations had led to this tragedy, was stoic and unrepentant.

“Josh,” I said, “that was not responsible.”

The other Cubs, the old guard of ten year olds to whom he was still an interloper, regarded him with disdain.

“We’re all a team, we get along …”

My own son had a superior, almost haughty look about him as he fell in with the anti Josh crowd.

“What happened, how did this … ?”

Words were failing me. Leadership was failing me. Suddenly I had a long look down the tunnel, through the dimness of opposing mirrors reflecting forever into the dark. Moments like this require either instincts to follow or a model to copy. I had neither.

“Josh, apologize to Steven.”

He did.

“What are you going to do so it doesn’t happen again?”

He didn’t know. Another Cub, who had no doubt witnessed a similar scene in his own history, said Josh should keep his hands to himself unless he has permission. I silently thanked that kid’s parents and said something to the effect of, Yeah.

Shortly they were back on track, energetically integrating whatever project I had set up for them within their natural chaos. I had a moment to look down that tunnel again and try to find understanding.

Boys need a man to lead them and show them. In the 1970s, society tried to drum that out of us. Too many men gleefully took the cue to abandon their responsibilities. But it’s true: without a male figure leading us as boys, we are lost and, too often, never again found. In that moment, as in thousands of other moments as a father, I felt lost. I had no childhood experience of male leadership to subconsciously process and return to the next generation. Forty years had given me nothing to base a plan on that would work with ten year old boys. I had nothing to fall back on but logic.

Fortunately, with boys logic often works. For about six minutes. I heard a scream and saw a shoe flying through the air.

“Josh!”

“It isn’t me!”

9 comments:

Paula said...

What? We can't say that boys (*and* girls) need two parents because then peeps might be dissuaded from splitting up and finding true happiness, the kids will notice that their parents are unfulfilled, and that'll be WORSE. Because, um, well, it just will. Wasn't there a study? What kids need is to watch parents selfishly pursuing happies cuz then they will learn to do the same, and don't we want our kids to be happy, huh?

Jodie Kash said...

Fathers must also be present and heroic enough men for daughters to fall in love with them first. Hard to find and value a good man later when one doesn't show himself at the beginning.

Anonymous said...

Better no father at all than a crappy one, IMO. At least, that's what I would have chosen, and indeed what I begged my mother for, during my entire miserable asshole-parented childhood.

I'd have no freaking clue how to parent a son. Boys of any age terrify me just as much now as they did when I was their age and they made my life a living hell.

Natsthename said...

My husband had no permanent male in his house growing up, and he often has no clue about how to parent his two sons. I try to help out, but I don't want to get in the way of the males learning from each other!

We made a deal: I did the cub scout thing, and he worked with the boys scouts. I think dads should do both, with moms helping out when necessary. I'd prefer to stay out of camping, though! ;)

Teacake said...

peeps might be dissuaded from splitting up and finding true happiness, the kids will notice that their parents are unfulfilled, and that'll be WORSE.

Wellll I assure you, living in a house with both my parents would've been infinitely worse. I'm very grateful my Mom had the courage to divorce at a time when it was an unpopular thing to do and when she had very few resources with which to raise 3 small children by herself. I don't think we can be cavalier about people's reasons, or generalize that it's selfishly motivated.

In any case, the parents don't need to be married to be present in their children's life. Sure, it's a more ideal situation, but being divorced isn't an excuse for being absent either.

Paula said...

True, I was being flip. I might have been better off if my parents had split. All that screaming and fighting, ugh. But I mean, you know, if the parents are generally acting decent but are vaguely unhappy with their relationship.

Jodie Kash said...

Happy Birthday, doll ;) Day or two late...

So write something new already.

Anne said...

are you all packed and ready for the burn? lucky you!

Don said...

No ... not really ...